New Control System Has What it Takes to Guide Experimental Aircraft
April 30, 2009 By Administrator
April 30, 2009 – When a jet is flying faster than the speed of sound, one small mistake can tear it apart.
When a jet is flying faster than the speed of sound, one small mistake can tear it apart.
And when the jet is so experimental that it must fly unmanned, only a computer control system can pilot it.
Ohio State University engineers have designed control system software
that can do just that — by adapting to changing conditions during a
Government agencies have been developing faster-than-sound vehicles for
decades. The latest supersonic combustion ramjets — called scramjets
— burn air for fuel, and could one day carry people to space or around
the world in a matter of hours.
The recent success of NASA's X-43 hypersonic jet has spurred research
into the control systems for these vehicles, said Lisa Fiorentini,
doctoral student in electrical and computer engineering at Ohio State
She and associate professor Andrea Serrani are developing a new control
system in collaboration with the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory
(ARFL) at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio.
In the current issue of the Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics,
they report that their controller performed flawlessly in computer
simulations of flight maneuvers.
The controller both guides the jet along its trajectory and keeps it
stable during a flight, Fiorentini explained. Sensors measure factors
such as altitude, velocity, and acceleration, and the controller
calculates whether any adjustments need to be made to keep the jet
stable and on course. Then actuators carry out the controller's
commands — for instance, throttling up the engine if the jet needs to
"Because these vehicles are unmanned right now, we have to prepare
everything ahead of time — anticipate every possible in-flight event,"
"And the controller has to work really fast. At 10 times the speed of
sound, if you lose just one second, the jet has gone far, far off
What sets the Ohio State control system apart, Serrani explained, is
that it allows for flexibility: it adapts to changing conditions during
"The truly remarkable feature of our approach is that we consider a
realistic, physics-based vehicle model within our stability analysis,
using a highly sophisticated controller," he said.
Most other research teams build their controllers from very simplified computer models, Fiorentini added.
"Since we are working with Wright-Patterson, we have access to the most
sophisticated model available for this aircraft," she said.
They are collaborating with Michael A. Bolender, an aerospace engineer,
and David B. Doman, a senior aerospace engineer, both of ARFL, as well
as Jack McNamara, assistant professor of aerospace engineering at Ohio
The Ohio State engineers derived equations that describe a scramjet's
flight dynamics and behavior. Then, given the vehicle model by their
partners at Wright-Paterson, they created a set of algorithms that
could ultimately be built into a scramjet's on-board computer.
Today's experimental scramjets are not merely supersonic — meaning
they fly faster than the speed of sound, or Mach 1 — but hypersonic,
meaning they fly at Mach 5 or faster. The most recent X-43 flight in
2004 neared a speed of Mach 10 (Mach 9.8, or 7,546 miles per hour).
Scramjets are shaped to scoop oxygen from the atmosphere during flight
in order to ignite the hydrogen fuel already on board. This eliminates
the need for heavy external oxygen tanks, and enables scramjets to
carry more cargo than a typical rocket.
NASA had explored scramjets as a successor to the Space Shuttle for
trips to the International Space Station. The X-43 project closed in
2004, as the space agency shifted its priorities toward a return to the
But the technology is still under development in military and
commercial sectors. Scramjets could deliver missiles to mobile targets;
they could also carry people halfway around the world in less than an
For this study, the engineers simulated two flight situations. In the
first, simpler case, the scramjet had to climb from a level flight to
13,000 feet in a little less than six minutes. In a second, more
complicated maneuver, it had to start at a few degrees off-kilter from
a level flight, and then climb 25,000 feet in about four minutes.
In both simulations, researchers recorded the controller's tracking
errors as the jet executed its maneuver. Then they compared the results
to simulations using a controller they had developed previously — one
that did not have adaptive capabilities built in.
For example, in the simpler maneuver, the largest altitude tracking
error for the older, non-adaptive controller was just over 40 feet; the
largest corresponding error for the new, adaptive controller was less
than 2 feet – an improvement by a factor of 20.
For the more complex maneuver, the non-adaptive controller failed —
the simulated jet spun out of control and crashed in less than four
seconds. The new adaptive controller was able to guide the jet to its
new altitude without incident.
The Ohio State and AFRL engineers are continuing to refine the
controller. The next improvement will add some safety limits,
Fiorentini said. Scramjets need to maintain the right amount of airflow
to the engine, she explained, and if they rise too fast, the engine may
stall in mid-air.
This work was funded by the ARFL and the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research through the Ohio State University.
Print this page